Letters | Skateboarders speak out against city bylaw

Published Thursday May 15th, 2008
B7

On April 30, my brother Lee Breen was convicted of violating a bylaw banning skateboarding on city streets.

My brother has no criminal record and is a solid member of our community. He is very concerned about the environment and has recently opened a zero-emissions lawn-care service (Gas Free Grass Cutters) using a traditional reel lawnmower, hand clippers and organic compost.

He's also committed to zero-emissions transportation, and uses his bike and skateboard to move around the city.

In the May 1 issue of The Daily Gleaner, Mayor Brad Woodside supported bylaw S-9, saying "Skateboarders in busy traffic can be a dangerous situation."

I agree that skateboarding, bicycling, running and walking on our streets is more dangerous than driving a large car/truck/SUV. Those who choose to cut their carbon emissions accept increased risk to their person.

I personally use a skateboard for transportation from my house on Inglewood Drive to my place of employment in downtown Fredericton. I wear a helmet, use hand signals and stay to the side of the street. The argument that this is more dangerous than biking simply does not hold water.

Fredericton's Green Matters initiative on active transportation reads as follows:

"Canadian adults take over 2,000 car trips every year that are three kilometers or shorter. Leaving the car keys at home and pulling out the walking shoes or bike helmet can save you gas money, reduce your emissions by up to 250 kilograms of CO2 per year, and help you become more physically active."

Skateboarding is active transportation. Lee is being incarcerated for adhering to Fredericton's Green Matters and active transportation policies.

I am certain that future generations would support Lee and condemn a city council who jailed a man for using zero-emissions transportation when the perils of global warming and increased carbon emissions had become so apparent.

Bylaw S-9 must be repealed by Fredericton city council.

Fergus Breen

Fredericton

Skateboards are not a nuisance

I am writing in regards to Fredericton bylaw S-9 and specifically section 2.05 of the bylaw, which makes it a crime to skateboard on city streets.

With the environmental crisis facing citizens of the world, as well as gas prices facing citizens' wallets, an emission-free mode of transportation similar to bikes, rollerblades and push-scooters should be encouraged rather than outlawed.

Fredericton resident Lee Breen is willing to face jail time for violating bylaw S-9. It is shocking that a citizen will be spending time behind bars simply for using a clean, fun and safe vehicle to travel through our city.

I urge Fredericton's newly elected city councillors to strongly consider repealing section 2.05 of bylaw S-9, which for the record is a "law to prevent nuisance." Other activities deemed illegal by this law include fighting and throwing snowballs at cars.

Perhaps skateboarding has been placed in the wrong group of activities.

Ben Conoley

Fredericton

Give the proposed Geodex mine a fair hearing

I was in Fredericton last week and read with interest the letter by Lawrence Wuest (May 6) on Geodex's proposed tungsten-molybdenum mine near Napadogan.

His letter is peppered with dire warnings and a general "sky is falling" attitude, which is premature at this stage and generally designed to scare the public unnecessarily.

We started the company's community meetings early in the process precisely to inform the public of what we're doing, and to allow them to follow our progress.

At this stage, the mine is still under study. On the tailings front, Geodex is committed through its independent engineers to the highest construction standards for dams. While there is always some risk of failure, it has to be considered very remote and is hardly an "extremely dangerous threat."

Water is recycled to the process plant and tailings rapidly compact. Any breach would likely produce no more than a short flow of sand-sized rock flour. He comments also on the apparent poor prospects for molybdenum (his projections), neglecting to mention that revenue at the mine would be derived equally from tungsten and potentially from copper, providing a degree of insurance. Again, there is risk in any enterprise, as he must be aware.

However, Geodex will not commit to building a mine without independent metal price and marketing studies. It is not in the company's interest, or that of its bankers, to invest half a billion dollars without due care. Mr. Wuest must also recognize that commodities generally are undergoing historical price increases due to burgeoning economies in China and the other BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) countries.

Will this trend be short-lived? It seems unlikely. New Brunswick considers itself to be a mining-friendly province. This means, in essence, that extremely remote risks are reasonable in view of exacting environmental and construction standards. This applies equally to developments other than mines.

The local jobs and tax revenue which would flow from a mine with multiplier effects throughout the economy are likely to be considerable. Mines have a relatively small footprint. It hardly seems that the Bathurst mine has "imperiled the treasure" of rural New Brunswick, to use his words.

I would urge Mr. Wuest and his associates to contact our Fredericton office for progress and perhaps consider a more balanced view of the development.

Jack M. Marr, P.Geol, M.Sc.

Vice-president of exploration, director

Geodex Minerals Ltd.

Electronic voting machines threaten democracy

The Toronto Star reports that New Brunswick is the first province to use electronic tabulation machines for its municipal and school board elections, 229 in all.

I wonder if chief electoral officer Michael Quinn realizes what he is doing by approving and implementing this activity. In my opinion, he has no respect for the sanctity of the secret ballot, a pillar of our democracy, and its tabulation.

To be valid and true, votes are tallied by eye witnesses such as poll clerks, scrutineers and others. A computer machine is not an eyewitness. A machine can easily be "adjusted," as the voters in Ohio found out with those Diebold machines in 2004.

This electronic voting machine exercise will spread to higher levels of government after this. The voters will be told that this method is faster and less labour intensive. Shame on the voters of New Brunswick if they agree with Michael Quinn.

Claudia Hudson

Brantford, Ont.

Thoughts on French immersion 'orphans' of province's decision

A central tenant of Education Minister Kelly Lamrock's embattled plan for French language instruction in our province is that children currently in the early French immersion program will be "grandfathered."

Recent events suggest that it will be more like "orphaned."

Children in Grade 1 should expect to have 11 more years of their program, yet District 2's website has completely expunged any mention of the program. As a hint of worse to come, District 18 has removed all remedial help for EFI students, and similar programs are being cut in District 8.

Studies over the past decade have argued that the proper way of reducing streaming out of EFI is to provide it with better support, as is done today in Nova Scotia.

However, when Lamrock apportioned funds from the joint commission on classroom composition last year, over $1 million was provided for special help in the core program, and only $4,000 for EFI students. No wonder parents of struggling students are encouraged to migrate to the core program.

It seems that if Lamrock is allowed to continue down this uncharted path, he will do even more to ensure that EFI becomes the "elitist" program he has criticized.

Stephanie McCarty

Fredericton

Please Log In or Register FREE

You are currently not logged into this site. Please log in or register for a FREE ONE Account.
Logged in visitors may comment on articles, enter contests, manage home delivery holds and much more online. Your ONE Account grants you access to features and content across the entire CanadaEast Network of sites.

Comments (7)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

As time goes by, more and more details of the lack of a plan in Lamrock's plan emerge. Parents of children already in the program think they are 'safe' but the truth is, their kids are being systematically abandoned by the Dept of Ed, teachers leaving and resources being quietly stripped away.

42
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 15/05/08, 8:08:40 AM ADT
"Mines have a relatively small footprint". That's laughable. Mining is the most destructive method of resource extraction, completely unsustainable. Unlike forestry, there is no replacement of the resource, and what is taken can never be replaced. Plus, mining creates numerous toxic byproducts that run off into our waters and seep into our wells.
Don't listen to the industry's comforting reassurances. We have enough evidence to know that we should indeed be very wary and very worried. Mining companies - as Mr. Marr's letter explains - are only interested in making money, as any company. They do not care one iota about the health of the people or environment around the mines.
10
Thumbs Up
12
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 15/05/08, 8:39:37 AM ADT
Lamrock is so determined to prove himself correct that he will do anything to make streaming worse in EFI.
35
Thumbs Up
7
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 15/05/08, 8:41:43 AM ADT
Lamrock's concept of 'right' is 'whatever I can get away with'.
35
Thumbs Up
7
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 15/05/08, 9:31:19 AM ADT
Lamrock's ship is sinking--too bad our kids are going down with him.
26
Thumbs Up
7
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 15/05/08, 10:37:35 AM ADT
I would like to offer my suport to this city's skateboarders. We live in a small city, in which far more people than have need to do so, choose to use their cars for transportation. Fredericton is a lovely city for walking, running, and biking (and I assume skateboarding, though for the record I do not own a skateboard). A principal source of danger for people who choose green tranportation methods (and here I can speak as a walker, runner, and cyclist who conscientiously follows traffic laws) is the lack of respect that drivers show for the people with whom they share the road. Drivers hitting the gas when they see people trying to use a crosswalk (I've experienced this more than once as have many others with whom I have spoken) are a far greater danger to public safety than are skateboarders.

The letters above, highlighting the ethical reasons for choosing green transportation methods, are timely. Such arguments should influence the city's traffic policies in the future.
3
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Interested Party, Fredericton on 16/05/08, 10:59:16 AM ADT
i think its stupid how people rallied for him not to go to jail. if i had to pay a fine for speeding id either have to pay it or serve jail time, its as simple as that, he didnt pay it (or want to pay it) so he went to jail instead and of course clueless people are saying "Hes going to jail for skateboarding" hes not going to jail for skateboarding, hes going to jail because he refused to pay a fine. law is the law, we all have to abide by it. so that demonstration was really a bunch of people who had no clue what they were doing. i think its stupid how they were supporting him, would you support a drunk driver who refused to pay his fine and opted to do the jail time instead?? DIDNT THINK SO

I worked the election and the voting machines are great! they worked fine!
6
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 16/05/08, 11:58:03 AM ADT
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles