Drunk driver admits she killed her friend

Published Tuesday July 22nd, 2008
A1

A judge sentenced a single mother of two to 32 months in federal prison Monday for driving drunk last year, leading to an accident that killed one of her passengers.

Click to Enlarge
Ray Bourgeios
SENTENCED TO 32 MONTHS IN PRISON: Julie Lynn Dorcas, 26, is escorted from the Justice Building in Fredericton on Monday after being sentenced for the death of Troy Price, 19, who died last year.

Julie Lynn Dorcas, 26, previously pleaded guilty in Fredericton provincial court to a March 31, 2007, charge of impaired driving causing death.

Troy Price, 19, was one of five passengers in Dorcas's vehicle when she lost control of the vehicle and it left the road, coming to rest in a ditch. Price died as a result of the accident, while the other passengers sustained minor injuries.

Crown prosecutor William Corby said officers who responded to the accident scene along Royal Road in the early hours of March 31, 2007, noticed a smell of alcohol on Dorcas's breath and that she slurred her words.

She confirmed she'd been driving the vehicle.

A blood-alcohol analysis expert estimated that at the time of the accident, she had twice the legal limit of alcohol in her system.

Tests also revealed traces of cocaine and THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, in Dorcas's system.

"The group had been partying," Corby said.

An RCMP accident reconstructionist reported that the car was travelling 91 kilometres per hour in an 80 km/h zone, the prosecutor said.

Corby noted that one of the victim-impact statements filed by Price's family members mentioned that the teenager's mother was born deaf and that her only son had served as her ears for years.

Price's family members wept as the circumstances of his death were conveyed to the court.

He said in its recent decision in the case of Peter Leon Howe, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal ruled that he merited a three-year prison term in a fatal drunk-driving case.

Howe, 43, struck cyclist Robbie MacRitchie, 23, on Lincoln Road while driving impaired July 16, 2006.

Corby asked that the same sentence be imposed in Dorcas's case in order to emphasize general deterrence to the public and to denounce the crime.

Defence lawyer David Hitchcock agreed that a federal-prison sentence was called for in the case, but he suggested a range of two to three years would be appropriate.

He said the accident has obviously had a "monumental" impact on Price's family.

"Nothing can replace a life when it is lost," he said.

He said while Dorcas was speeding at the time of the accident, it wasn't excessive, and the investigation revealed she was the only person in the car who was wearing a seat belt.

She's been in counselling and treatment for addictions since the accident, the defence lawyer said, and she's offered no excuses.

Hitchcock said that after he received disclosure of the Crown's case, he told his client she had defences available to her that could have resulted in a not-guilty decision or guilt on a lesser charge. Instead, he said, she chose to take full responsibility.

"She said to me, 'Mr. Hitchcock, I was drinking. I was driving. And my friend is dead,'" he said, and she didn't want to put anyone through the ordeal of a trial so she pleaded guilty.

He said Dorcas deserves a lesser sentence because in the Howe case, it was a hit and run, Howe tried to cover up his crime, he breached conditions placed on him by the court and he killed a stranger.

Hitchcock said Dorcas's passengers all knew what they'd been up to that night and they got into her car voluntarily, opting not to use their seatbelts.

He said Dorcas has two children, aged seven and two years, and she's already made arrangements for their care while she's gone.

"She knows she's going to jail," he said.

Dorcas told the court there are no words to describe her regret and she hopes her punishment will bring some measure of peace or closure to Price's family.

"I do not believe that I deserve any pity, nor do I want any," she said, tears streaming down her face.

Judge Graydon Nicholas, whose original sentence of house arrest was overturned in the Howe case, said the Court of Appeal has provided him with guidance in sentencing in cases of impaired driving causing death.

He said such behaviour has to be denounced in no uncertain terms and that sentences have to be harsh enough to deter others from driving drunk as well.

Case law also indicates that society shouldn't view such incidents as unfortunate accidents but as wilful crimes, he said.

"The consumption of alcohol is a voluntary act. The consumption of drugs also is a voluntary act," the judge said.

However, he said, no two cases are the same.

"You did not leave the scene of the accident. You did not try to cover anything up," Nicholas said.

That's why he chose to sentence her to 32 months in prison as opposed to 36 months, he said.

The judge also prohibited Dorcas from driving for four years following her release and ordered her to pay a victim-fine surcharge of $100.

Pam Henderson, Price's cousin, said outside the courtroom that the prison sentence came as a relief.

"I'm happy that she was sentenced to at least something," she said.

"(Troy's) death has been at least acknowledged."

Henderson said she was worried Dorcas might get a sentence of house arrest because she has two young children.

Please Log In or Register FREE

You are currently not logged into this site. Please log in or register for a FREE ONE Account.
Logged in visitors may comment on articles, enter contests, manage home delivery holds and much more online. Your ONE Account grants you access to features and content across the entire CanadaEast Network of sites.

Comments (36)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Okay... let's look at this situation. Julie Dorcas goes out, drives while being drunk. She has an accident, the result of the accident, because she was under the influence of alcohol and cocaine is, that a human being lost their life. She gets a sentence of 32 months in prison. So, she will serve ... 1/3 of that? Maybe?... so someones life is measured by 2 1/2 years? Wow. So, in 2 1/2 years...where will Troy Price be?..still dead. Apparently Julie Dorcas has been drinking since this accident happened. I don't see how that would indicate any kind of remorse, but I suppose in the court room, you really have to play it up. Whether someone has young children or not... when you take someone's life, you need to pay for taking that life. 32 months (and we all know she won't serve even close to that) doesn't 'repay' for taking someones life. And furthermore, if she has a problem with alcohol and drugs, why did she have the children in her care anyway??...
107
Thumbs Up
103
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
S. M, Fredericton on 22/07/08 07:36:22 AM ADT
Honest to GOD you people NEVER let up do you??! Did you purposely wake up EARLY this morning, JUST To find this article and bash her again?

Its over, its done with PLEASE MOVE ON WITH YOUR LIFE! You people who come on here just to bash Julie, or bash the courts for their ruling. Need to seriously find something to do with your time and get a life.

Toy Price will still be dead. Doesn't matter how much time Julie serves. Nothing you crazy people who LIVE to bash Julie, do is going to change this! I think that you need some serious counseling and move on with your life. Think about it, you literally woke up EARLY this morning, just to comment on someone who just went to prison, and bash them? Give your head a shake!

The courts acknowledged the fact that Julie has sought treatment. She didn't hide from this, she faced it. She ADMITTED to what she did, and plead guilty. I think the persons involved with EDUCATIONS and Lawyer's degrees, might have a bit more insight into the matter.
74
Thumbs Up
115
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader, F'ton on 22/07/08 08:16:34 AM ADT
I wonder if all the bleeding hearts out there would have the same reaction had this been a man driving or had been their child killed.
110
Thumbs Up
29
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
A. Harper, lincoln on 22/07/08 08:38:58 AM ADT
I forgot to mention above. I wholeheartedly feel terrible for the loss that the Price family has suffered. No jail sentences, sorrows, or apologies will never bring him back. Fighting isn't going to solve anything as well.
I feel terrible that his mother had to rely on her son, because she is hearing impaired, and now he is gone. That is a huge responsibility for a 19 year old, and due to his lack of maturity, he got into a car with a intoxicated person who was on drugs, and didn't wear a seat belt. Not realizing what will happen shortly after, and how this will affect his mother and family forever. And the same goes for Julie, she got into that car, had passengers, and drove, obviously aware that she should not have been. The Price family is destroyed because of this, and Julie's 2 gorgeous boys' lives as well. Such a shame. However, everyone needs to accept what has happened and move on with their lives...
68
Thumbs Up
59
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader, F'ton on 22/07/08 08:43:11 AM ADT
Wonder if it will be the same for a guy without any children.
86
Thumbs Up
27
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
David S, Fredericton on 22/07/08 09:01:37 AM ADT
In response to the anonymous reader above, questioning the jail sentence is very valid. After all, jail is supposed to be a deterrent to committing crimes and if the sentences are too short, then its effectiveness is lost.
97
Thumbs Up
13
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Oliver D., Fredericton on 22/07/08 09:27:26 AM ADT
Actually, when the people complain and debate on a well read news forum about the irregularities of the justice system it is in fact a way of showing that some people believe that the sentence is not enough for the severity of this crime.

I think that just because if someone has an addiction or just happens to enjoy drugs/booze and go driving with kids doesn't mean that you have excuses for bad descisions and ones like this that course death.

If you constantly give people lighter sentences for the people who like booze, drugs and go driving than to others who don't it doesn't set much of an example to do the right thing.

Though she looks young and pretty enough so im surprised she even has to go to jail at all! :)
94
Thumbs Up
20
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Jonathan Wilby, Fredericton on 22/07/08 09:45:48 AM ADT
Her sentence is only 4 months shorter than Mr.Howe's. We are not talking a whole year difference. Who is to say how much time Julie will serve, I guess we can only assume what the time frame will be.

However, both situations are completely different. We are talking about a woman who NEVER once put the blame any where else. She took full responsibly for what she did, she didn't hide it, she stepped up to her actions.
If you want to go ahead and think that this has to do with the fact that she is "pretty", that is your choice. Her appearance has nothing to do with this. I'm certain that her being a mother did impact the outcome of the case.
In regards to ppl debating on a CanadaEast forum, do you seriously think that this would affect the outcome of anything?? Or have any impact on how a judge is going to rule? Sir, you are seriously mistaken. We are just a bunch of mosey people,voicing our opinion, and thats as far as it goes. Write a letter to the editor, see how far that gets you.
40
Thumbs Up
62
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader, F'ton on 22/07/08 09:52:06 AM ADT
Just because she has two young children doesn't give her the right to kill people. So it's okay to have kids, do drugs, drink and drive and kill people in the midst of it, as long as I seek help and plead guilty? So that's all that we have to do to have a short sentence? All of that isn't going to bring him back. He won't have a second chance at life...why should she? She made the choices that she did...to do drugs, drink and drive, so she should be prepared to suffer the consquences. Sentences for such offences are way too short because the system is so crowded with such criminals that they are running out of room.

She also doesn't deserve to get her kids back! If she really loved her kids, she'd never do the drugs and alcohol to start with! My hubby had an irresponsible "mother" like her, but thankfully was adopted by the wonderful parents he has. He has turned out to be a wonderful husband and Dad thanks to the influence of his parents. Give her kids a GOOD mother!
80
Thumbs Up
41
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
anon reader, Fredericton on 22/07/08 09:57:30 AM ADT
she should have to pay the same price as the victim. Life!

Now i don't belive in the bible crap everyone goes on about. but i do belive in an eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth!
70
Thumbs Up
44
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Ryan T., Nashwaak Bridge on 22/07/08 10:07:49 AM ADT
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles